🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. Survive an important European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in individual battles succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, based on his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Regarding System & Ideology

For example, this was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to outline his thought processes publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being ready to receive.

An Supreme Authority Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his desire for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he announced that United’s style to football “shall be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and yachting. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Whom else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

The Modern Football Order: Directors Over Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their methods accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not really responsible for the product, but still finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss him for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then bin them for taking too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.